    
 |
Bryan
Hassel and Lucy Steiner, “Stimulating the Supply of New Choices for
Families in Light of NCLB: The Role of the State,” Education
Commission of the States, September 2004. |
New York’s
urban school districts, home to an overwhelming number of failing
schools, have limited options for fulfilling the public school choice
requirement under the federal No Child Left Behind Act. Charter
schools can help meet the needs of students trapped in these under
performing schools.
 |
Todd M.
Ziebarth, “Closing Low-performing Schools and Reopening them as Charter
Schools: The Role of the State,” Education Commission of the States,
September 2004 |
This paper
explores the option of restructuring traditional failing schools by
converting them into public charter schools, thus complying with the
demands of NCLB and providing students a better quality school.
Non-Regulatory Guidance from the US Department of Education
 |
“The Impact of the New
Title I Requirements on Charter Schools Non-Regulatory Guidance,” U.S. Department of Education,
July 2004. |
This non-regulatory
guidance explains how the provisions for accountability, choice,
supplemental educational services, and other NCLB requirements, impact
charter schools.
 |
“Charter Schools
Program Title V Part B Non-Regulatory Guidance,” U.S. Department of
Education, July 2004. |
This non-regulatory guidance addresses questions
regarding various provisions of the Charter Schools Program statute,
including those related to student admissions to charter schools, the
use of lotteries, private school conversions, and the involvement of
for-profit organizations in charter schools.
|